
However, for the other 8 cases, it was mostly a battle between CopyScape and PlagairismDetect Premium. Interestingly, in the two short story tests, PlagairismDetect Standard did better than its Premium sibling (and CopyScape). With the documents selected, I ran all ten through PlagiarismDetect Premium, PlagiarismDetect Standard and Copyscape. However, I keep these (mostly) hidden to prevent other plagiarism services from studying for the test.) ( Note: As with previous tests, if either company wishes me to provide the URLs tested, I will do so.

I took a look at 10 different documents, they included:

CopyScape was chosen because it has been well-tested (on this site and elsewhere) and it’s performance generally well-regarded. To test PlagiarismDetect, I followed the now-standard procedure of putting it through a battery of side-by-side tests with CopyScape. ( Sample Report Here)įor a service like this, how good it will come down to the matching and that is what I decided to put to the test.
#Writecheck vs ithenticate download#
There is no ability to have it check a URL, while it has the ability to download a report, it doesn’t display anything not seen in the Web version of the report. You can go through the document and determine which copied passages are plagiarism or just examples of copied material used correctly.Īll in all, PlagiarismDetect is a fairly no-frills service. The text provided is displayed with the questionable passages highlighted and a list of suspected sources to the left. The results of the search are displayed in a straightforward format. For example, 276 words will cost the same as 549 as they are both in the 275-550 tier. It’s also worth noting that the pricing is done purely based on tiers, rather than the pure word count. This means even the most basic search involving the shortest work costs 10 cents. Standard searches cost 1 credit for 275 words and Premium searches cost 5 credits for 275 words. The amount of credits a search takes depends on both the type of search being performed and the length of the document. After purchasing credits, which cost 10 cents each (minimum purchase of 50) users can then either paste in the text they want to check or upload a document (TXT, DOC, DOCX and ODT files only). Regarding the service itself, anyone who has used a plagiarism detection service should feel comfortable with PlagiarismDetect’s interface.

The product is targeted primarily at students and teachers who want to check works for plagiarism but is also used by corporations, in particular publishers, webmasters and others to check for originality in documents. According to their about page, they are on version 3 of their service, which, according to them, is radically different from the earlier incarnations, having improved speed and accuracy. PlagiarismDetect is a plagiarism detection service that has been in operation since 2008. In the end, my experimentation with PlagiarismDetect painted the picture of a solid plagiarism checker with a somewhat unorthodox interface and an unfortunately high price point that may keep many people from using it. The results were interesting but somewhat inconclusive.
#Writecheck vs ithenticate free#
I was provided 200 free credits, $20 value, to test the service out and I used that to put PlagiarismDetect through a battery of tests, both to see how well it worked and how it stacked up against competitors. But with so many companies serving the major markets, PlagiarismDetect has an uphill battle trying to provide services that are compelling to users.Īt the company’s request, I decided to give PlagiarismDetect a try and see how I felt about it. is another online plagiarism checker that is trying to carve out a niche in the market. (Disclosure: I am a paid consultant for iThenticate, which is owned by Turnitin’s parent company, iParadigms.) There are also academic-oriented plagiarism checkers, such as PlagScan (Previous Coverage) and several ill-fated projects, all trying to take market and mindshare away from Turnitin.

Though CopyScape is still the best-established and best-known among webmasters, there is also Plagium ( Previous Coverage), PlagSpotter ( Previous Coverage) and Plagiarism.Pro ( Previous Coverage) to name a few. With more and more plagiarism detection services coming online, it’s admittedly getting harder and harder to keep track of them all.
